Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Shreveport/archive1

Portal:Shreveport

Thought I'd give it a shot, trying to get often overlooked city some attention, it has a lot of history and culture to share with the world Justin 03:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• I think the portal looks good, but it was only created in the last few days. A featured portal must be well-maintained, and that requires some months of work to build up a track record.-gadfium 04:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. Nice start, but the portal is brand new. Consider withdrawing and asking for feedback from volunteers on the portal's talk page.
  • No evidence possible to support What is a featured portal? criterion, the portal is "well-maintained." In particular, no developed archive selections.
  • Image sizes too big for 1024X768, let alone 800X600 displays.
  • No image captions.
  • State and All-America templates beyond scope of portal. City template full of red links.
  • "Featured articles" aren't. Rfrisbie^talk 04:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose per Rfrisbie. s d 3 1 4 1 5 final exams! 12:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. As well as above comments, needs explicit image credit for selected image. As well, I'm not sure if the scope of the portal is broad enough to support the What is a featured portal? criterion. --Gphoto^talk 14:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Wikipedia:WikiProject_Shreveport withdraws nomination to make corrects and let portal mature with more archived material.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.158.160.66 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 17 December 2006.