Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Luminol2006.jpg
- Reason
- Tagged as a featured picture by User:AndrewFlorea in November 2009. I am unable to find a discussion to promote it. I also do not believe it meets FP criteria.
- Articles this image appears in
- Luminol, Enzyme assay
- Previous nomination/s
- None (that I can find)
- Nominator
- Jujutacular T · C
- Delist — Jujutacular T · C 03:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delist, apparently promoted entirely contrary to our procedure. J Milburn (talk) 11:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delist, there should be a warning issued with this as well from an admin! — raeky (talk | edits) 12:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Second thought, this doesn't even need a delist discussion, someone just delete the tag and warn the guy... — raeky (talk | edits) 12:59, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delist per above, I don't think it was a result of malice though - the user's first language is very probably not English. Noodle snacks (talk) 13:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Delisted --jjron (talk) 15:04, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. We don't need to delist what was never featured, but will put this onto the 'archived removal requests' page since this subpage now exists (btw, how did you ever find it?). --jjron (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comparing transclusions of the FP template versus pictures listed in the thumbs. See Wikipedia_talk:FPC#FP_count. Jujutacular T · C 15:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've done that before - that's a time consuming task, what inspired it? --jjron (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- I noticed recently that the main page upload bot had been deleting the local file pages for FPs after its day, without restoring the tags. So I decided to check to see what kind of damage had been done. Lo and behold the three ways we have counting FPs didn't agree at all :) This case I thought I would at least list here, because you never know, with all the moves/deletions/renamings/etc. Jujutacular T · C 15:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- That's pretty poor form, wonder what led to that. I tried to remedy errors and reconcile the counts less than a year ago as we headed into FP 2000, but I doubt I actually got it completely right. See Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates/Archive_23#Massive_stuff-up. BTW, left the editor responsible a note; it seemed a good faith error - he's an irregular editor, and as NS said, possibly not English speaking, at least not as a first language. --jjron (talk) 17:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- I noticed recently that the main page upload bot had been deleting the local file pages for FPs after its day, without restoring the tags. So I decided to check to see what kind of damage had been done. Lo and behold the three ways we have counting FPs didn't agree at all :) This case I thought I would at least list here, because you never know, with all the moves/deletions/renamings/etc. Jujutacular T · C 15:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've done that before - that's a time consuming task, what inspired it? --jjron (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comparing transclusions of the FP template versus pictures listed in the thumbs. See Wikipedia_talk:FPC#FP_count. Jujutacular T · C 15:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. We don't need to delist what was never featured, but will put this onto the 'archived removal requests' page since this subpage now exists (btw, how did you ever find it?). --jjron (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)