Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/chips

Potato chips

Original - Bad UK. These are chips.

Reason

Because it's featured picture worthy?

Articles this image appears in

Potato chip

Creator

• Support as nominator :D\=< (talk) 00:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose I'm not sure about this, but I had a feeling the middle is slightly out of focus. Looks yum though. Dengero (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC). Oppose after looking a the pictures given by froth. FP quality, especially with hazelnuts and raspberry clearly contrasted the non-FP qualities of this image. Dengero (talk) 05:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I like to think of it like how could you possibly make a more encyclopedic image of potato chips? It's high def, mostly in focus.. good enough? :D\=< (talk) 01:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose The caption annoys me. We call jelly jam, and jello jelly. Language varies. Anyway, pettiness aside, not a particularly interesting or original subject, even if the photo has good quality. --Extr3me (talk) 01:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Geez dude, mellow out, it's called a joke. I have to oppose though, for the reasons already given. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 02:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Not interesting? Compare with similar compositions: Image:Hazelnuts.jpg Image:Raspberries05.jpg Image:Alaska wild berries.jpg Image:Pecans.jpg.. :D\=< (talk) 03:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support - I like it and fail to see how a better composition can be achieved
• Moderate Oppose Technical quality isn't the best, and it isn't a very interesting subject for an FP. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 14:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I chuckled slightly at the immature caption, but there is zero 'wow factor' here. Perhaps BBQ chips would provide a more interesting shot? </joke> faithless (^speak) 02:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Not promoted MER-C 08:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)