Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Anuran families/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by The Rambling Man 16:38, 18 July 2009 [1].
- Featured list candidates/List of Anuran families/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of Anuran families/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: LiquidGhoul, WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it has a list of reliable print sources, but no inline citations; we don't know what information is attributed to what source. Also, it has only four sources. Tezkag72 (talk) 18:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now. Three of the four sources were links, you could cite the information from them yourself and have the article's primary author cite the rest from the book. Abyssal (talk) 18:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Are there any WikiProjects that can be notified? Dabomb87 (talk) 20:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The list may actually be out of date, following recent taxonomical changes. See for example, Frost et al (2006), The amphibian tree of life [2] and the Amphibians Species of the World (one of the sources) is now in version 5.3, which incorporates a lot of the changes proposed in the 2006 paper. GoEThe (talk) 22:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist The WP:LEAD does not summarize the article as well as it should. The tags at the top need to be solved. A featured list being "out of date" is very worrisome to me.--Crzycheetah 02:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Per lead, comprehensiveness, and citation concerns. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.