Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Ravichandran Ashwin/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Ravichandran Ashwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): —Vensatry (talk) 06:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No bowler has taken more fifers than Ravichandran Ashwin in the past one year. Making his Test debut in 2011, he is comfortably placed above the Indian spin quartet. I've modeled this list based on similar FLs. As always, look forward to comments and suggestions. —Vensatry (talk) 06:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- "as of August 2016" → replace with template {{As of|2016|8|lc=yes}} so it sorts in the categories
- I think your mention about his 18 fifers should be in the first paragraph as it is the most important statistic as that is what the article is about
- In the image caption you should talk about his fifers not his ten-wicket hauls as the article is about his fifers
- "in the format" - which format?
- are a record → is a record
— Great work. Almost ready to support if the above five points are fixed. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yellow Dingo: Fixed all. Thanks for the comments. —Vensatry (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support nice list. Good work Vensatry! Also, would you mind having a look at this FLC I have open? If not thats ok. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - can't see any issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my issues addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review - All references are well-formatted and to reliable sources, and the link-checker reveals no issues with dead links. I spot-checked references 7, 10, 11, 15, and 19, and found no concerns. Overall, the article passed the source review with flying colors. While doing checks, I noticed that the Sir Vivian Richards Stadium cell in the table could use a space after the second comma, so you may want to tweak that quickly. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008: Done, thanks for the review. —Vensatry (talk) 08:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.