Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Steve Smith/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of international cricket centuries by Steve Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ~Binod~(talk) 15:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC), The Rambling Man (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because the list contains a well sourced and informative list of international cricket centuries by Steve Smith. The citations are reliable as ESPNcricinfo is a reliable source for cricket articles. ~Binod~(talk) 15:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from TompaDompa
Resolved issues
|
---|
#scoring 138* against– readers not familiar with cricket notation are likely to be confused by this. Try to reword it in a way that doesn't rely on the asterisk.
|
- The key should not have its own section.
- I don't see why not. It's a reasonably consistent approach across most such century lists. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Much of the information in the key is unnecessary in that format. All the abbreviations in the table should be explained with the {{Abbr}} template instead (and have links where appropriate). Only the symbols need to be explained in the key.
- I don't see why not. It's a reasonably consistent approach across most such century lists. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TompaDompa (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- TompaDompa, responded inline above. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem I have with the key is that it is overly prominent and takes focus away from the actual content. TompaDompa (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- That's fine but I'd rather be consistent across the vast majority of these lists. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- TompaDompa, anything else? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- No, that's it. TompaDompa (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- TompaDompa Okay, could you collapse your comments then please as they appear to be discouraging further comments. Feel free to leave your preference related to the Key out for others to see of course. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Like so? TompaDompa (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- TompaDompa Okay, could you collapse your comments then please as they appear to be discouraging further comments. Feel free to leave your preference related to the Key out for others to see of course. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- No, that's it. TompaDompa (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem I have with the key is that it is overly prominent and takes focus away from the actual content. TompaDompa (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- TompaDompa, responded inline above. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note, the nominator (Binod Basnet) has subsequently retired from Wikipedia, and if no response is forthcoming in the next few days, I will adopt this review and address the above concerns and any others raised. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Now running with this myself. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Allied45 (talk) 00:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Allied45 (talk) 11:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support all my comments have been resolved. Allied45 (talk) 00:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I got nothin' :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:52, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
Not sure that the first word of "International cricket" should be capitalized like it is now. That's all I found to nitpick.- Quite so, thanks for spotting that, now de-capitalised. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- While I'm here, I did a source review. All of the references are well-formatted and reliable, and they are all archived, so I consider that a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Everything looks to be up to standard now after that one minor fix. Nice work as usual on this one. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting! --PresN 15:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.