Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Jessica Chastain/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of awards and nominations received by Jessica Chastain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This listing of Jessica Chastain's awards and nominations will help me complete my Chastain trilogy. As usual, I'm looking forward to lots of constructive inputs. Cheers! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from BeatlesLedTV
[edit]- Make sure titles in the work section aren't sorted by "a, An, The, etc..."
Looks great. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, BeatlesLedTV. :) I've sorted the titles correctly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Looks great! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Aoba47
[edit]- For this sentence (The supporting role of an aspiring socialite in the latter earned her nominations for the Academy Award, BAFTA Award, and Golden Globe.), I have only seen “the latter” used when referring to two objects (i.e. the former and the latter) and the previous sentence mentions three films. I think that it would be better to just name the film here to avoid any potential confusion.
This is my only comment/suggestion for the FLC. Great work with this. Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate feedback on my current FAC. Either way, have a great week! Aoba47 (talk) 02:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the suggestion, Aoba47. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing this. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 06:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the suggestion, Aoba47. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 22:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – The last fix to the sorting looks good and I don't have any other complaints. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – All of the references appear to be sufficiently reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker tool shows no dead links. Spot-checks of refs 51, 92, and 101 revealed no issues. Overall, I'd say this source review is a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 03:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.