Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1947/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1947 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry folks, here is yet another in the never-ending country number ones project. So far 56 of these have been promoted to FL, so here's the next one, covering a year in which one of the most successful songs was about smoking cigarettes - not sure that would happen nowadays....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ~ HAL333([2]) 21:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Everything else looks great. ~ HAL333([3]) 21:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support ~ HAL333([4]) 21:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support! Support! Support! (apologies to Mr. Williams) – All looks good. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - the things I would suggest would be using
{{abbr|Ref.|References}}
for the table's reference heading and adding archive links to the online sources, but aside from those nitpicks everything looks good.--AlexandraIDV 16:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from TRM
- "songs in the United States, based on the number of times a song" songs/song repetitive.
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- " in jukeboxes; " for my benefit, where were these jukeboxes? How many were there? The List of Billboard number-one country songs article isn't very helpful in that sense. Indeed, shouldn't that article be linked here somewhere in the lead?
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, mildly confused now as this list says "The Juke Box Folk chart is considered part of the lineage of the current Hot Country Songs chart" but I though the link above was more relevant.
Apologies, I may be being very thick but I don't understand. What "link above" do you refer to? And could you clarify how the sentence is confusing? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]- I get it now - fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- " in the top spot." repetitive as you started the sentence with "The number-one position ..."
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- " in the top spot since the issue of Billboard dated October 26, 1946," how many weeks was that?
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the chronology for Travis is mildly confusing, you could (and should) add that Tubb broke the Divorce Me C.O.D. run and went back to number one between Travis' hits.
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- "He would have two " tres americain. "He had two"?
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- And then you go into "would" overdrive!
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- " country number one singles" should that "number-one" be hyphenated?
- Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Bob Willis (not the cricketer) was "widely known as the "King of Western Swing",[11]" but I looked at source 11 and could see that phrase at all. Our article also calls it "Western swing" rather than "Western Swing".
- Different source found. Also note it's Bob Wills, not Willis :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I have for a quick western swing by. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 21:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: - all done
bar one where I could do with some clarification.......-- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 10:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – The reliability of the sources looks fine throughout and the link-checker tool shows no problems. Just a few random formatting issues to fix:
The page range in ref 4 looks funky. You have two of the same number in there.Refs 3 and 4 should probably have the longer 13-digit ISBNs, for consistency and per MoS guidelines.Ref 2 could use an en dash in the title for the year range.Giants2008 (Talk) 23:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008: - all done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- All of the changes look good. The source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.