Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Wolves seasons/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Hahc21 02:21, 13 February 2013 [1].
List of Chicago Wolves seasons[edit]
List of Chicago Wolves seasons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 17:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that it is comparable to other Ice Hockey season lists such as the List of Calgary Flames seasons. Cheers Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 17:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment beyond the bloated roster on the main Chicago Wolves page, this minimal season list would be easily at home in the main article, so I'm dubious about this list's ability to overcome the 3b criterion. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure if WP:NOTIMELIMIT would come into play on this one, but I am planing on expanding the Wolves main page to be more like the NHL articles, which all have pages like this one. It is somewhat of a daunting task to research the entire history and the various subsections and write them, so I began with some clean-up. I created this page and List of Chicago Wolves award winners (which is not quite complete) and figured if I was going to make them I would make them right. Cheers. --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 04:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course, there is _no_ time limit but if you're going to expand the main page, I would suggest you do that (to an extent) to ensure that this list is completely free to standalone. It shouldn't be too hard. Naturally you're welcome to keep the nomination going, after all, my opinion is just that, my opinion, but if you're game, withdraw this, do a bit of work on the main article, bulk it out so it's clear that a standalone list for the seasons is required, then renominate... The Rambling Man (talk) 18:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the delay in responding. My editing time is somewhat reduced right now, so I doubt I'll be able to expand the Wolves page significantly very soon. I have started something in my sandbox, but it will take longer than I anticipated. How about this, leave it opened for the rest of this week and if it fails to gain any new comments/support and I don' get the main page expanded just go ahead and close it. Once I do get the main page beefed up I'll bring the list back. Thanks, --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, will do. Thanks for letting us know. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the delay in responding. My editing time is somewhat reduced right now, so I doubt I'll be able to expand the Wolves page significantly very soon. I have started something in my sandbox, but it will take longer than I anticipated. How about this, leave it opened for the rest of this week and if it fails to gain any new comments/support and I don' get the main page expanded just go ahead and close it. Once I do get the main page beefed up I'll bring the list back. Thanks, --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course, there is _no_ time limit but if you're going to expand the main page, I would suggest you do that (to an extent) to ensure that this list is completely free to standalone. It shouldn't be too hard. Naturally you're welcome to keep the nomination going, after all, my opinion is just that, my opinion, but if you're game, withdraw this, do a bit of work on the main article, bulk it out so it's clear that a standalone list for the seasons is required, then renominate... The Rambling Man (talk) 18:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So, what do you reckon? Not sure the main page has been updated sufficiently... The Rambling Man (talk) 20:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You can close this and when I get the main page further expand I'll bring this back. I feel that the list in this format provides more information that a smaller list that could go on the main page to prevent it from being disproportionate, but I understand where your coming from. No point in having people waste their time reviewing the list if it will fail 3b, I fully intend to expand the main page which should alleviate that concern, but we'll cross that bridge when we get there. Cheers --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 01:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.