Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Fanny Lú discography/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Hahc21 00:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Fanny Lú discography[edit]
Fanny Lú discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Luis Nuñez (talk) 00:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it to be complete and well referenced, also for support the organization for the information about Latin articles. I look forward to any comments that can help make this a Featured List. Thank you very much! – Luis Nuñez (talk) 01:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid the list does not satisfy the criteria for Featured List at this time:
- The article has unreferenced content. For example, the list states Fanny Lu has sold over three million copies worldwide but it does not have a source or an "as of" date.
- "This album is characterized for the fusion of vallenato and tropical rhythms, becoming a tropipop album." This also needs a source.
- The Colombian Album Charts is unsourced.
- FN 5 sources a fan site which are not acceptable as reliable sources. See WP:IRS.
- Per WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS, the Bubbling Under 100 should not be listed as an extension as the Hot 100. Rather, the field should be left blank with an explanation that it ranked on the Bubbling Under charts.
- The lead also suffers from grammar issues, for example: "In December 2008 was released the second studio album Dos. The album debuted at #70 on Latin Albums chart in the US and was certified Gold in Mexico, were singles:" This is not proper English. I understand if English is not your first language, so your best bet is to request a copy-edit at WP:GOCE.
- Some of the citations need to be fixed. For example, you list billboard.com as the work when it should be Billboard with the publisher being Prometheus Global Media.
- My recommendation is to look at the Ricardo Arjona discography as an example of how a discography list should be done.
Erick (talk) 18:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose – Erick is right about the condition of the list. No citations in the lead, poorly formatted references, and other issues that he pointed out earlier mean that the list does not meet FL criteria. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The nomination was not complete, so I have added it to the FLC page. Erick (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose – I agree with Erick and Giants2008, the discography isn't FL material. My biggest concern is its lack of citations and the reliability of the ones that are in the article. – Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.