Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/All That/archive2

All That[edit]

Self-nomination: This article has been edited to death, and I think we finally have a coherent, in-depth, well-written article in its current revision. After everything that the All That article has gone through, I feel it is time for it to become a featured article. I feel it has been cleaned up enough to meet all criteria. PF4Eva 23:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, at least until the eight citation needed tags are taken care of. Rewired 23:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The trivia section also needs to be incorporated into the article. Rewired 00:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment its very list heavy, can't some of it be converted to prose? - Tutmosis 23:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also I would like to add that the article definetely doesnt follow structure guideline previously defined by the community. WikiProject Television has a wonderful example of how a television article structure should look like. - Tutmosis 23:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. List heavy, and not adequately sourced. Besides the 'citation needed' tags, this article cites information to forums, which is not acceptable per WP:RS and WP:V. The discussion about fans finding the earlier seasons better is original research unless a reliable source (like a professional reviewer in an entertainment magazine) makes these claims. I notice this is also the second FA nomination for this article; I recommend removing unsourced statements and trying to get this article up to Good Article status before nominating it again. -- Bailey ^(talk) 17:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]