Wikipedia:Editor review/wpktsfs2

Wpktsfs

Wpktsfs (talk · contribs) My name is wpktsfs, and this is my second time at editor review. I combined my first time with this, my second time for my personal ease of reading.wpktsfs 22:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

• Wpktsfs has been a very encouraging and helpful influence to many users; including myself. He is a great Wikipedian and deserves all he asks for. I couldn't think of anyone better that I know to get a job done for me. Meldshal42 21:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Wpktsfs is very courteous, and has a quality I love seeing in editors - not being afraid to ask for help. Wpktsfs is very dedicated, and has created articles that are simply superb. I really don't see anything that can be improved. All I can say is please keep up the good work! Saber girl08 20:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• Given your level of experience, both in the real-world educational system and on the fictional world known as Wikipedia, you have contributed with surprising facility. You are starting out the way many people start out: writing about what you know. I recall that my first article, back in December 2005, was J. David Bleich, one of my rabbis. So it's to be expected that you'll write about places in your hometown. As you develop, you will learn to check the notability of your subject before writing too much about it, and you will branch out to cover topics outside your immediate concern.

I wish you good luck. YechielMan 04:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• I haven't had enough of an opportunity to form a strong opinion. Sorry, but good luck. --evrik ^(talk) 20:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• This user welcomed me to Wikipedia, and, later, adopted me, and sent me off on my own. He is a great editor, and has a positive attitude and outlook here. I nominated him for adminship, but he graciously declined, stating that he was not yet fully prepared, but I believe he is, obviously. I hope that he someday becomes one, and he will add even more positive contributions to Wikipedia. hmwithtalk 14:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• You're clearly a good editor with a lot of mainspace contribs. If you're aiming towards adminship in the future I'd advise a little more participation in projectspace - especially more XfD participation - but once you have at least 2500 edits I'll be happy to nominate you. Walton^{alternate account} 09:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Wpktsfs is a very pleasant editor and I envy the quality and thoroughness he uses on Wikipedia. Scottydude _talk 00:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• I am very happ to review you, of what I can see you are a very polite, civil and level headed editor, I like the usage of an edit summary and the edit count is too very good, if you would like to consider RfA I'd suggest getting your mainspace edits up to at least 2000 and then I'll nominate you in the future as I think you'd make a great admin. The Sunshine Man is now Qst 11:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

• View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I am really happy with how One SeaGate came out. Moreover, I created WikiProject Swimming and I am very pleased with how the project is continuing to grow. My first article St. Francis de Sales High School (Toledo, Ohio) is the largest article out of all the other articles about Catholic Schools in the area, and I take pride in that. Just in the past few months I adopted hmwith, and she is now up for adminship, and that is another source of pride for me.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I had to deal with a sockpuppet problem. I mistakenly took an editor for a sockpuppet, and you can see the archived conversation here. I personally feel that I handled the problem well.

Question moved to this page.