Jump to content

Wikipedia:Editor review/jak119

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:jak119[edit]

jak119 (talk · contribs) I am becoming a farily frequent wikipeida user and would like to be reviewd to find out what everyone thinks of my job. jak 23:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • Hey buddy. Looks like I get the honor of doing your first review.
Hmm, to be honest, there's not all that much to review. You've made around 40 edits on this account over a period of two and a half months. The edits are mostly Wiki-gnomish in nature, which is great... articles are always in need of cleanup and attention to detail.
Looks good buddy. Although I am a bit puzzled as to what you're looking for by posting an editor review. With so few edits it's hard to give you much feedback. Perhaps you should include a link to the contribs of your IP?
Best wishes and happy editing! —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 01:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I got what I want from Lantoka just a little heads up on how i'm doing, trouble with putting my IP down for my contributions is that I have a dynamic IP and I edit from several different computers and different IPs
  • Good call on registering an account then. I'm glad my review was what you were looking for. Happy editing! —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 04:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Answer
    I am particularly pleased of my start of the WCCC-FM article that I created before I had an account under my IP. Also I have attempted to help as much as I can with several other pages that I am familiar with such as my schools (Thomaston High School) and my towns (Thomaston, Connecticut).
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Answer
    In my past I have never come to any conflicts. Although in dealing with conflicts I would follow proper wikipedia procedure and then I would attempt to back my claim with as much evidence as I could.