Wikipedia:Editor review/Willisis2

Willisis2

Willisis2 (talk · contribs) I would like to be reviewed because I love Wikipedia and want to help change it by being an administrator to make it better. Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 18:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

chrislk02 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Ok, First I will review general contribution patterns, edit counts and time here. looking at your edit count/history, it appears you have a fairly low edit summary usage. This is almost always frowned upon. I would highly reccomend you get your edit summary usage up to 100% from now on. You also have fairly low Wikipedia and Wikipedia talk space edits. Edits in these areas generally show that an editor has a strong grasp of policy and how things are done on this project (such as usage of WP:AN, WP:ANI, WP:AIV, WP:AFD) I highley reccomend doing some work in the WP:XFD area if you are looking to eventually become an admin. I dont see that you have ever made an WP:AIV report either. You have been here for 3 months, which is not bad, If you are looking to become an admin, i reccomend waiting 3 or 4 more months, while you work on the areas mentioned in this review. It is good to see that you have worked on some articles, and your work on Reverend Zen appears pretty good. I reccomend keeping up the good article space work as well. Hope this helps. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 14:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and after i looked a little more into your talk page and saw a conflict you were having with Gwernol, this is an area you may need to work on. Civility is extremely important to the smooth functioning of this project. Most editors here are not out to harass you, but instead help you. Heeding their advice instead of becoming uncivil will help you significantly in the long run. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I am proud of my creation of the articles Reverend Zen, Jack Evans (musician), The Stone Coyotes, and The Stone Coyotes discography because they are successful and my first real contributions to wikipedia. Also, I added the monomers and polymers section to Biochemistry, which is pretty nice.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   At first, I had some stress over a couple articles and some images, but after the user who caused it always helped me out. They gave me help and I followed what they wanted me to do, and now I don't even need their help much.