Wikipedia:Editor review/Uirauna

Uirauna (talk · contribs · count) STATEMENT Uirauna (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
When I have free time (rarely) I tend to do some random patrolling and recent changes checking. Most times I just keep a watch on my watchlist pages. I decided to choose a topic to which I have no personal relation at all and work to keep it sharp and free from POV and vandalism. After a while I chose middle east history and politics, on which I believe I´ve been able to keep a fair standing, even on issues where I disagree.
Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
I´ve been on some editing disputes recentyl on the Iran-Iraq War, mostly over POV-pushing from other users. I've always tried to be civil and when necessary I tend to take a few days off from the article to avoid getting overheated. If necessary, I try to go through the formal dispute resolution process.

Reviews

All in all, I'd say you're a very good editor. You seem to have mastered giving informative edit summaries, and your civility seems in top shape (and I agree entirely with the timeout idea when the going gets rough :P), and your contributions to both articles and discussions are very constructive. I think the only shame here is that in over four years time your editing seems to have been so infrequent, with just less than 2000 live edits. Wikipedia needs more like you, Uirauna, keep up the good work! :) Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]