Wikipedia:Editor review/SunDragon34
SunDragon34[edit]
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
SunDragon34 (talk · contribs) Just want to see how I'm doing and how I could improve and gain more experience. Thanks! ~SunDragon34 (talk) 05:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Reviews
- SunDragon you are doing great so far. You edit many articles and areas, such as the MOS. I would just recommend seeking other areas, such as WP:GAN or even here at WP:ER to gain more exposure around other areas of Wikipedia. Since you don't actively contribute its hard to determined what you need working on daily, but overall that is basically it from me. I also like how you handle situations, its just best to be "laid-back" instead of being angry with other users. Keep this up and you will be the editor that you see yourself as :)--TRUCO 22:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Well, I've helped out with the Toy Story article. I haven't done much, but I just started a collaboration with another editor on it and am hoping to get it to GA-class soon. I also like huggling and other vandal-fighting, and I occasionally help out at SSP.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Not really. I'm generally laid back, and I understand when stressed-out editors talk to me the way they sometimes do. Here's an example (NSFW) and my response. I don't really get angry much on the internet, and I try to help people out as best I can. As far as I can remember, I have never had an edit-war or a heated dispute with another editor.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.