Wikipedia:Editor review/Razorflame

Razorflame

Razorflame (talk · contribs) I have been actively editing on this Wikipedia for several months now and I am wanting to get feedback on my contributions to make sure that I am doing things appropriately and correctly. Thank you. Razorflame 16:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

• You've done a lot of work combating vandalism. That is much needed and much appreciated. Other than that, you seem to keep a level head when interacting with other editors, and you are actively seeking to better understand Wikipedia policies. I think you are doing a very good job. Amillion (talk) 01:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

• Hello. I've noticed your vandalism reverting, and that is wonderful. However, I would like to see a larger number of article creations and contributions. Try nominating one article you find for DYK, and later GAs and FAs. Other than that, I have no other problems. Editorofthewiki^{review my edits here!} 23:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

• Hello, I am RyRy5. I've seen you many times on RC, mostly reverting vandalism and warning users (most of which you have beaten me in reverting and identifying vandalism). Keep it up. But please be more careful in reverting. Misuse of rollback can get it revoked. Try creating more articles often also. Nominate some articles for WP:DYK. It's fairly easy. Do some article expansion also. I don't think you have much problems here. Just join somw WikiProjects your interested in and start improving/creating articles is all I can say at this point. Oh yes, participate in WP:XfD. By the way, keep up your adoption with User:Useight. Don't be afraid to ask questions. Regards, RyRy5 (talk) 01:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

• Hiya Razorflame. I'd just like to say that a lot of editors really don't like to see Huggle use. Like Editorofthewiki stated, get some higher-quality edits rather than those from automated tools. I may comment more later, but I don't have much time. Cheers, Malinaccier Public (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

• Hello. Concurrent with the other editors, I feel that you would benefit greatly from really pushing some articles through the review process and from reviewing more articles yourself. The edit counter indicates that you've made multiple edits to the same article only a few times (the most being 17 edits to Intermittent explosive disorder, which were all vandalism reverts). Actually contributing to articles will help you learn the ins and outs of WP:MOS and WP:POLICY. Moreover, if you emerge free of uncivil conflicts after that, then that would be an accomplishment (referring to your response to Q2 below), as you will inevitably bump heads with a few editors along the way and learn how you handle yourself when trying to establish consensus. Best regards --Eustress (talk) 02:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I haven't written very many articles, but my best contribution that I know about so far, in terms of articles, is Anandite. In terms of my other contributions, I believe that some of my votes in the AfD and RfA pages are extremely well written and well composed. I also am pleased with the amount of vandalism that I have been able to revert.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I have not been in any conflicts over editing in the past as far as I know. I have not felt as though any users have caused me stress.