Wikipedia:Editor review/Picture Frame

User:Picture Frame[edit]

Picture Frame (talk · contribs) I have worked heavily in updating and removing vandalism from pages over the past few months, and I would like to know if my assistance has been positive. Picture Frame 04:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Hi Picture Frame! Any contribution to Wikipedia is considered positive =)! Great job on your counter-vandalism works. You may leave a warning message on the vandal's talk page whenever you revert an vandalism entry (See Wikipedia:Vandalism for a list of warning templates).

Not much else to say for now, as you don't have that much edits. Cheers anyway! AQu01rius (User  Talk) 05:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be a very well oriented new user, Picture Frame. If you need some clarification on wiki markup, I'd suggest taking a look at the Manual of Style. Other than that you're on you way to becoming a good contributor, and we all hope to be seeing you around. Good luck! --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg ^{(drop me a line)} 11:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Answer
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Answer

1. I am pleased about my creation of the page for future George Washington University president Steven Knapp. It was a page I felt needed to be created.

2. I have not had any specific conflicts.