Wikipedia:Editor review/Papercutbiology

Papercutbiology

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Archival note: Archived with consent of user (open past the 30 day time limit).--Truco 16:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Papercutbiology (talk · contribs) I have been reverting vandalism, and fixing minor things in articles for some time. :) I'd appreciate any tips..etc. Papercutbiology♫ (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Reviews

• You seem to be doing quite well for a new user, and seem to be working in different areas of Wikipedia. I would recommend only welcoming users with contributions rather than looking at Special:Log/NewUsers. -download | sign! 19:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
• You have an upbeat userpage and congratulations on not being blocked! If you are looking for tips of what else you can do here, we can always use help rescuing articles. Otherwise, I don't see anything that jumps out as a concern. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 00:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I usually do alot of vandalism reverting, so I am most pleased with that. I love being dedicated to keeping Wikipedia clean.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   Well, one time in the article fourth dimension, but it wasn't a really big deal. Plus, the person was an IP...and I don't think he really understood me or knew any better although he insulted me a little. Either way, the situation in the end was handled nicely.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.