Wikipedia:Editor review/Mostly Rainy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Mostly Rainy[edit]

Mostly Rainy (talk · contribs) I've been here for over six months and need some feedback. Though I have just 300 edits I need to know if there are areas in need of improvement. I intend to become a sysop some day, but I know I need at least 1500-2000 edits. In the meantime, have your say. Mostly Rainy 04:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • I notice that you have a relatively huge number of Wikipedia space edits (very nearly a third of your total), and that's quite outstanding for as new a user as yourself - it'll help a lot if/when you run for admin privs. However, most people place considerable emphasis on two other areas of experience: content edits to the Article space, and vandal-fighting. For the former, you may wish you join an existing WikiProject that piques your interest and work on wikifying/expanding/copyediting articles that fall under that Project's scope. For the latter, I suggest you take a look at Recent Change Patrolling, as it's an excellent way to quickly get into the meat of administrators' normal workload. You're a promising editor, and I'd certainly like to see more of you around in the future. RandyWang (raves/rants) 09:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I've been creating pages by puting articles where red links appear. Here is a sample of my contrubitions:
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I once tried to update team sites with their current win-loss records each day but a user advised me not to, I disagreed but when other users supported his idea I agreed to stop and haven't had any issues since.