Wikipedia:Editor review/Matthew
User:MatthewFenton[edit]
MatthewFenton (talk · contribs) I would like to request a review for editors to analyze my contributions and behaviour and give me pointers as to how I may improve my self. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 17:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Reviews
- First off, congratulations! You're an excellent user, and Wikipedia can always do with more such as yourself around. I suppose you should probably shorten your sig a bit (it's about twice as long as most users find comfortable, believe it or not), or perhaps reduce the size of the text with the <small></small> tags. I can't actually see anything in your recent edits that needs attention - no red flags, and nothing I could do better - so I guess I'll just leave that to someone who knows you better. :) Keep up the good work! Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 11:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using a PHP version of Interiot's tool.
- User's current editing statistics according to Flcelloguy's tool. Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 11:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Statistics for: MatthewFenton (Permissions: N/A) - Total: 6238 - Main: 2837 Talk: 464 User: 201 User talk: 964 Wikipedia: 654 Wikipedia talk: 119 Image: 576 Image talk: 6 MediaWiki talk: 2 Template: 244 Template talk: 154 Category: 11 Category talk: 2 Portal: 4 ------------------- Total edits: 6238 w/ edit summary: 5698 (91.34%*) w/ manual edit summary: 5030 (80.63%*) Minor edits: 899 (14.41%*) First known edit: Dec 6, 2005 ------------------- * - percentages are rounded down to the nearest hundredth. -------------------
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes. (will write longer answer explaining situations later tonight)