Jump to content

Wikipedia:Editor review/Law Lord

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Law Lord[edit]

Law Lord (talk · contribs) I have been on Wikipedia for more than 4 years though not so active all the time, I guess. I am just wondering a bit about whether my contributions are at all appreciated or not. Often I get the feeling that people really prefer to delete whatever I write. Law Lord (talk) 12:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether I will ever get a single review. --Law Lord (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • Review by LAAFanYou're the first editor I've reviewed, but I feel every user's editor review should at least have one review. Anyway, I just did a quick skim. First, I would remove the section on your userpage about "how people on Wikipedia suck". I would also suggest participating in some administrator activities. I saw that you work on article, but you do not have a GA or FA. I would suggest maybe getting a DYK. Cheers.--LAAFan 21:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I think my "important" contributions have probably been creating articles about important topics that were totally missing from Wikipedia. Most recently The Blekinge Street Gang but also stuff that I have corrected from being totally false like this edit in connections with this one.

Exercise more care in creating articles. Michael Causer, for instance does not meet wp notability guidelines for a bio. Move the article to the murder of or something and research notability etc before creating such an article. 118.172.29.38 (talk) 08:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Yes, I have been in plenty of conflicts. I feel that many administrators that I have had interactions with have been extremely rude and condescending in both their communications and actions. More recently I have tried dealing with this by emailing the more normal administrators privately asking for help and advice and ignoring those editors and administrators whom I see as guilty of harrassment against me. I ask for the right to add to this answer if need be.