Wikipedia:Editor review/Greeves 2

Greeves

Greeves (talk · contribs) It's been a couple months since my last review and in the next few months I would like to look into running for adminship. What have I done right? What have I done wrong? How can I improve? Am I almost ready for adminship? So many questions... Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

casmith 789

Having never seen this user before, I decided to do an editor review purely out of interest. From a Requests for Adminship point of view, you may need to improve your edit summary usage from 60% (there is a check box in your preferences that helps you remember). Your mainspace edits are quite low, and although I do not think that should be a prerequisite, many users feel that building an encyclopedia is what Wikipedia is about and therefore significant contributions should be made to the article space. Although your Wikipedia space usage is quite high, many of the edits are on the same WikiProject (this is good, because it shows devotion) but it may leave you unfamiliar with deletion processes such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. It may be wise to spend some time there helping people. If you do all that I suggest over the next two to three months, and then apply for Adminship, you may succeed. -- Casmith_789 (talk) 10:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

• View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

• View this user's last editor review.

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I don't work much in the mainspace as I'm quite metapedianist. I have recently been working on references for the MMORPG article though. I am also pleased with WikiProject MMO a WikiProject that I founded which works on MMO-related articles.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   No, I have not been in any conflicts. If I were to though, I would assume good faith and try to work the problem out with them. In the case of a content dispute, I would leave the article alone for a while. If I were to ever get really worked up about a problem, I would probably take a week-long wikibreak to stay as cool as a cucumber.