Wikipedia:Editor review/Extranet
Extranet*[edit]
Extranet (talk · contribs) Hi All, I am currently thinking about Requesting for Adminship and I do wish to have a detailed Editors Review before that, so I can possibly improve with my editing on WP. Cheers and Many Thanks! Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 06:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Pages you'll want to read up on include WP:REVERT, WP:WARN, WP:BLOCK (in regards to anti-vandalism) and WP:XFD in regards to deletion policies and discussions. Until you know the full purpose of these pages, you shouldn't run for adminship. Xiner (talk, email) 19:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- There is a few edits of some Australian (especially close to the Brisbane area) theme parks, hospitals and schools. I am also starting to patrol recent edits and revert vandalism, which is also tied in with the Recent Changes patrol.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I have been in a few conflicts throughout my time at Wikipedia. I was uploading images for a great article I had created around December 2006 and all 5 images were deleted. I trusted what OrphanBot had done, but I was sure there was something wrong. After much consideration and talk discussions with Administrators, the images were kindly reinstated. I am a friendly person and would always deal with conflicts in a non-violent way.