Wikipedia:Editor review/Dogposter

Dogposter

Dogposter (talk · contribs · count) I just want to see what others think about the editing I do on this site. Dogposter 21:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, do you think I would be a good admin if I get some more mainspace edits and experience? Dogposter 00:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Questions

1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?

   I sometimes edit various science articles, but lately I have begun reverting vandalism more.

3. Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to (edit conflict)) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I have never been in any major disputes, just some vandalism to my user page that was reverted and once had a minor argument over a redundant template.

Reviews

1. I think that your vandalism work is great. Maybe some work patrolling the New pages to diversify your edits, but otherwise, you seem like a pretty good editor. By the way, watch your user page edits. I just realized they account for about 1/8 of your current edit count. *Pepperpiggle*^*Sign!* 22:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't edit userpages a lot anymore, but a while ago I edited mine quite a bit so even though I don't do that as much anymore, the edits are still in my record. I think they're fading out now. Dogposter 14:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

1. I think that the Pepperpiggle put it perfectly and also I think you would make a great admin. Spike35031 (talk)