Wikipedia:Editor review/Darren23
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Darren23[edit]
Darren23 (talk · contribs · count) I'm Darren23, and I have actively been here since June. I am an active member of WikiProject Tropical cyclones. I have rollback rights, which have helped me revert vandalism using the rollback tool, Huggle and Twinkle. I want to be reviewed because I want to know what the community really thinks of me and how can I be better in contributing to Wikipedia. Darren23 My Contributions 00:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Reviews
- Review by Jason Rees (talk · contribs)
Youre a good editor whos got the potential to become a great editor. You can say/do some really stupid stuff at times for example Taking a wikibreak because we are in the elnino part of the elnino cycle. But you are a great help to me and Cyclonebiskit at times and will become a great editor at some point in the future. I think the WPTC is gonna need all the help it can get over the next few months since we already have an active SHEM which is gonna get even more active and possibly even break some records, so if you can help us out with the logs and making sure the articles are properly written to the project standards it would be a great help.Jason Rees (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- My greatest contributions so far are updating the current active seasons when I have time, reverting vandalism, and doing fixes here or there. I have been pleased at some of my reverts and the appreciation by some people about them.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I have done a few merges relating to Tropical cyclones like Tropical Storm Danny (2009) and the article was unmerged because of the excess amount of information in the season article. More recently, I was involved in 2 pretty major debates in WT:WPTC about ACE and putting the current seasons Accumulated cyclone energy even though the season was active and some users were displeased about my proposal. The other one was about some technical numbering stuff about Tropical depressions and it all came to some users reverting and rollbacking before achieving consensus. I have dealt with it fairly well and one of the 2 discussions in the WT:WPTC was resolved.