Jump to content

Wikipedia:Editor review/Daniel 123 (2)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Daniel_123 (talk · contribs) I recently passed the 1000th edit mark (a large achievement) and am looking into areas where I could improve. I am an active vandal fighter, I'm trying to get a vandal group off the ground. I have been vandalised several times, and have dished out several-fold of that warnings. I am an active contributor to WP:AIV. I have nominated several article for SD. I also actively rennovate other users' pages as part of my assistance to Esperanza. Some time ago, I requested an editor revew. see my original editor review  Daniel_123  ►  00:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I have created many law articles and quite a few redirects. I often go to lists of requested articles just to see how I could best benefit the project. I may have spent a little much time on my user page, but don't even act like you don't envy it.(jk) I created an article called Kobe Bryant sexual assault case.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I get in the occasional scuffle (don't we all) but I usually try to resolve it on the article talk page or with a civil discussion on the users' talk pages. I am the only thing less formal than an informal mediator, and try to resolve conflicts this way. I often go to the talk pages of controversial topic to try and keep a cool tone in the discussion if this is needed.