Wikipedia:Editor review/DBD II

DBD II[edit]

DBD (talk · contribs) I'm an experienced editor, usually working in the remit of WP:BRoy and several television dramas. I found my last review useful and want to know what's thought about my progress – D B D 19:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

I reviewed parts of your talk page, and I glanced at some pages you've worked on, and I read your previous Editor Review. My impression is that you are doing very well: you've contributed consistently for many months to your chosen field, and you get along well with other users. I admire the reserved tone you expressed while arguing with a troll last November. Since you edit many high-profile articles, maintaining civility is a constant challenge, where you must always remain vigilant.

I noticed that Elizabeth II was a declined Featured Article candidate. I would encourage you to gather the resources of your Wikiproject and give it another shot. If you really know and love the British royalty as much as it seems, you should be aiming to produce articles of the highest quality about them. I wish you good luck. YechielMan 03:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you sometimes use denigratory terms when reverting vandalism on the Royalty pages.[1] I appreciate that vandalism is extremely annoying, and I've lost my temper a couple of times about it too, but it may be something you'd like to rethink. DrKiernan 12:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I don't believe the answers to either of these to have changed since my first review

DBD was very gracious when I proposed quite strongly that WP:BRoy join forces with WP:WPBIO, and together we got the job done quickly and without fuss. --kingboyk 14:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]