Wikipedia:Editor review/Cometstyles

User:Cometstyles

Cometstyles (talk · contribs) I would like to be reviewed because I want to know if the Contributions I make on Wikipedia is Helpful.I have Created Over 50 Articles to date but Unlike most Editors I dont Edit one or two Articles bit on a General Basis meaning that I enjoy looking for Articles that need help or those Articles that needs to be Reverted or Deleted.I have helped get rid of Dozens of Articles and Images that were of no use to Wikipedia or were Racist or Biased.Simply I'am here to help and I mean Business.I havent made many Edits to one Article Because I prefer to Look at All Articles on Wikipedia as General and do Edits to those Articles that need it. I would Appreciate both Good and Bad Reviews from anybody because that would help me in the Future to Improve my Work.Thank You Cometstyles 13:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

• First of all, it helps me to review you if you put a statement up top. But anyway... From what I see you've certainly been active in the past few months, however I would encourage you to make more contributions to articles you're interested in. According to IWKT the most edits you've ever done to any one article are 16. While if you chose to make more edits to more articles without focus that's fine, but from personal experience I find it more gratifying to work hard at getting a certain article up to better shape. Secondly, I encourage you to be more active in Wikipedia space- Check out AfDs, vote on RfAs (if you have suffrage, I'm not sure), and overall get to know the ins and outs of Wikipedia's inner workings. Let yourself be heard! All in all, keep up the hard work, Dåvid ƒuchs (talk • contribs) 02:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Most of your contributions are minor contributuions (which isn't a bad thing!), but certainly it makes it hard to see how you are as an editor. Just my 2 cents. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 21:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• I would be glad to submit a review for you. I am quite impressed with both your major and minor edits, nothing to grip about that...however, your Wiki-space contributions are very low and there is no contributions on Wikipedia talk pages either. Wiki-space is always a good thing to utilize and I would strongly recommend that when you have the time to get involved in some Wikipedia:XfDs, report vandals at AIV, or become familiar with policy discussions. Another thing that may be an issue is your low edit summary usage (59% major edits, 79% minor edits). Edit summaries are a powerful tool and truly help you and other Wikipedia users filter through edit histories much easier. All in all, I believe you are shaping up as a nice contributer :), just get into some more Wiki-space please...¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Hey Comeystyles, I just to say thet you are doing great job. When I first started looking at your contributions, You've been speedy deleting nonsense articles and adding tags to images with no sources and what not. Which is good.

This is my first time doing a review for another editor so I don't really have anything serious critiques to say about you. I'm not the type of editor to critique another editor who assumes such good faith. So keep up the great work :) QuasyBoy 18:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

• Hi there! Sorry I'm days later than I said I would be. Anyway, I'm so glad you're contributing to articles about Fiji, and especially to Fijian rugby-related articles, as our coverage of Fiji in general, and Fijian rugby in particular, is very patchy (rugby was virtually nonexistent before you came along). I've noticed that you are beginning to get the hang of the way Wikipedia works, and you're following the manual of style more than before. Capital letters used to pop up in all kinds of odd places, but you're taking more care with that now. Just keep up the good work, and I look forward to working with you a lot more in the weeks and months to come. David Cannon 01:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   Well Most of my Contributions have been Mainly on Rugby Union ,My Country(Fiji)and some on Bollywood and Hollywood Actors and I'am pleased with all of My Work.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I havent Been in many conflicts since I joined in November 2006 but nothin too Harsh that would Deter Me from My Work. I'll Deal With all of My Problems, Major and Minor under the Wikipedia Guidelines.