Maryann Thompson – Deletion endorsed, recreation allowed. This is an non-admin close, however as per WP:DRV#Closing reviews...where a discussion has not been closed in good time (it's been 10 days) it is permissible for a non-admin (ideally a DRV regular) to close discussions. {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 17:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
This person is an FAIA, a prestigious fellowship that only a few architects may obtain. This person is also a winner of Women in Design Award of Excellence, 2005. ref I consider this to meet the criteria #1 of WP:ARCHITECT, that she is "regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors". CC @Loriannbrown --痛 (talk) 17:39, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse but allow recreation. While the fellowship was mentioned, the AfD was five years ago. It's possible consensus has changed, but there was no other way to close that AfD. (Courtesy ping still active participants: @Euryalus, Curb Safe Charmer, and TonyBallioni:. You're welcome to create the article with quality sourcing and sufficiently different that its not a G4.
Allow Recreation and the FAIA, when documented, should establish biographical notability under point 1 of any biography. I have not seen the deleted article, but no one mentioned the FAIA in the AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can confirm, FAIA in the version that was AfDed. Sourcing could have been better, but it did suitably verify the fellowship StarMississippi 23:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then the previous close was an error by the community. A main purpose of DRV is to identify and reverse errors by the closer. I don't see a provision for reversing errors by the community, because DRV is not AFD round 2. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse the close, but that shouldn't be the issue. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Allow recreation largely per Star Mississippi. Since page is not salted, the DRV request is not necessary. I agree that your analysis is sufficient for NBIO if properly sourced. FrankAnchor 22:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Allow recreation. Deleted version was mostly a lengthy, and rather puffy, profile of the firm with few independent sources. It's been five years so hopefully there will be more and better coverage now. Go ahead and write a new, better version. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
Procedural Close as Wrong Venue - If the subject is notable, the draft content should be merged into the article. If the subject is not notable, the article should be deleted so that the draft can be improved. The nominator appears to be in good faith mistaken as to what DRV is. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
Procedural Close as Wrong Venue - This appears to be a request to delete the draft, which should be made at MFD, but the result at MFD will be Speedy Redirect from the draft to the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
