Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 January 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

4 January 2021[edit]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Youth Against Rape (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

The reason for this deletion review is that, I believe it was dominated to delete by editors who worked on Smile Foundation, after my comment to delete that article (Retaliation). However, I would like to clear that in my opinion article may stand with some changes and some more sources (I also believe editors and closing admin didn't checked other language sources), so I would request you to kindly restore the article. For the socking part, I've talked with the administrators and understood WP:BROTHER, Kindly accept apologies on that. Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) 05:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Endorse - In my opinion, either Delete or No Consensus would have been a valid close. The title has not been salted, and the appellant is free to create a draft. If I were reviewing the draft, I would ask to compare against a copy of the deleted article to verify that the draft was better, and otherwise would Reject the draft. (This does not mean that I would accept a better draft, just that I wouldn't accept one that wasn't visibly better.) Robert McClenon (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Temp undeleted for DRV WilyD 05:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse. Correct reading of consensus, even if the closer was tentative in their wording. There is the possibility that the participants were over-harsh due to the influence of the WP:Reference bombing, which goes straight to the standard advice of following the advice at WP:THREE when appealing a deletion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment in my opinion notability had been established and I wasn't persuaded by the counter-arguments, but the consensus was for deletion and I can respect that. Pratyush.shrivastava may I suggest you first create a few other articles on notable topics on wikipedia, then return to this topic in a few months. Maybe by then (if no-one else creates the article in the meantime) there will be more reliable secondary sources and it will be easier to write a draft article. Best wishes for 2021! Mujinga (talk) 21:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse See no problem with the close. NavjotSR (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.