Closed too early by a non-admin. I don't believe enough time was given for a consensus to be demonstrated. —Chowbok☠ 16:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated 26.4.19, closed 4.5.19 which was the 8th day after nomination. I'm not experiencing any difficulty identifying the consensus in that debate.—S MarshallT/C 19:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse While I typically am skeptical of any NAC that's brought to DRV, I see absolutely nothing wrong with this close, a clear keep after more than a week of discussion, and while it's not necessary to mention in terms of the endorsement here I still think it's worth noting this was for an AfD of a GA which clearly appears to pass WP:GNG on its face. A relist would have been inappropriate. SportingFlyerT·C 22:06, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse - the consensus was clear, the discussion ran the full length, and evidence that the subject has clear notability was not effectively refuted. Time to move on. — Amakuru (talk) 22:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
