Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 April 28
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
A no-consensus closure, effectively a decision to keep the article, can hardly be justified considering the strength of arguments or even the mere number of votes. While the seven people arguing for deletion (and two suggesting a merger) pointed to policies, guidelines, severe WP:OR issues and lack of coverage in reliable sources, the five people who favored keeping the article merely said things like: "some trivia is useful and interesting." In fact, one of the five who favored keeping the article, a significant contributor to the said article, admitted that the article consisted of original research, said he or she would continue to violate OR across Wikipedia, and was indefinitely blocked for it. Simply put, I do not see which keep arguments outweighed the delete arguments. Surtsicna (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Surtsicna (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I would like to properly merge it into Discworld (world), but I would rather have the original information. Serendipodous (talk) 18:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |