Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 April 13

User:Jzsj/sandbox – DRV doesn't typically review revdels and in any case, we don't restore copyvios to Wikipedia. I've emailed Jzsj a copy of his sandbox, which is all we can do in this case. – TonyBallioni (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

copyright infringement The above entire page was just deleted for "Investigation of potential copyright issue". Now all I'm asking is that I have access to the material that I had laboriously collected so that I don't lose it, and can copy it to a word processing page outside Wikipedia. Contrary to the directions given in the deletion notice that "Temporarily, the original posting is still accessible for viewing in the page history", the User:Jzsj/sandbox: Revision history page gives no live links. I'd appreciate having access to the material at the bottom of the page just long enough to copy to a work page outside Wikipedia. I'd copied the material at the top of the page (which was preceded by the title "QUOTES FROM GAUDETE ET EXULTATE") and will not use this method again seeing it causes problems. But I had no copy of the material at the bottom of the Sandbox which consisted in quotes from books with the complete references of the books listed. The deleting editor's objection is given that there were no words of mine interspersed with the duly cited material. I will avoid this in the future but would like to recover this material to work it up outside Wikipedia. Any help with this is appreciated. The deleting editor may possibly be an address created only for this delete, since it was created only April 3 and has no other entries on the talk page.@2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26: Jzsj (talk) 16:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse deletion. Looking at the deleted text, it looks like it's a copy-paste from http://w2.vatican.va/, which says, © Copyright - Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Copyright violations will-not and can-not be restored. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you are referring only to the top one fourth of the page, which I agree should not have been so broadly referenced. What about the bottom three fourths which was duly in quote marks and referenced, where the only mistake was to not insert much commentary of my own between the quotes? The deletion notice says that parts of a page can be separately handled. And the question is not about deletion but about making the matter available for a day so that it can be copied outside of Wikipedia and a full week's work not lost? @RoySmith: Jzsj (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I picked something totally at random, about 3/4 of the way down the page: In his first meeting with the media, the new pope explained his choice of the name "Francis". That's almost word-for-word from a CNN article. I suppose it's possible to tease apart the parts that are copyvios from those that aren't, but that's a lot to ask from people. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how you can say that. In the CNN article I read rather: "The new pope explained his choice of the name Francis in a meeting with journalists Saturday and discussed how he wished for a church that was both poor and 'for the poor'." Jzsj (talk) 22:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Lena Piękniewska – Nothing to review. This seems to be a deletion nomination. These should be made at WP:AFD. – Sandstein 11:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

no notability, no resources except one youtube video and one article. This wiki-article (in Polish and English and French) clearly seem to be for marketing only :( Lantuszka (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If your intent is to nominate this for deletion, you want to do that at WP:AfD, not here. If you need technical assistance with the nomination, ping me. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

13 April 2018[edit]