Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 July 21

Kim Lee – Disambiguation page moved, nothing further needed here. – Jclemens (talk) 06:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Page needed again but only to redirect to disambiguation page The Gnome (talk) 10:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is no primary topic for the title, surely the correct approach is to move the current disambiguation page to Kim Lee? This wouldn't require any undeletion, or even a discussion here, since it's more than likely to be uncontroversial. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree with moving the disamb page to Kim Lee, and I'd agree that it's uncontroversial PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Antiobjects – Userified to User:Dragentsheets/Antiobjects per request and consensus here. – Jclemens (talk) 06:37, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

The main concern of reviewers is the small number of references. The Antiobject work was peer reviewed and presented at a highly competitive ACM conference (OOPSLA). Most people ended up referring to the other part of the paper title "Collaborative Diffusion", e.g., http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=4767535398279606115&as_sdt=4005&sciodt=0,6&hl=en Others implemented and documented their version of Collaborative Diffusion, e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YE4pM1QIVzE and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84DGA_iBYps Beyond academic interest the idea of Collaborative Diffusion/Antiobjects is be used to teach thousands of students how to make game AI, e.g., http://scalablegamedesign.cs.colorado.edu/wiki/Collaborative_Diffusion. In other words this work has practical as well as theoretical impact. The text could be clarified and references could be added. Thank you. Dragentsheets (talk) 05:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion was back in February. Would you like the article restored to user space so you can improve the article to include these additional references? That seems the simplest way forward here, since the deleted article had but two references. Jclemens (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support userfication PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:41, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Restore for further work. The paper referred to has had significant impact - see The Productive Programmer for more details. Warden (talk) 15:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would like the article restored. I would add the new references including the one pointed out by Colonel Warden. Thanks!--Dragentsheets (talk) 23:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.