Images can be claimed under fair use and is somewhat necessary to help visualize this design concept. — OranL (talk) 18:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn — OranL (talk) 16:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It would have been more efficient to contact me at my talkpage if you need some fair-use deletion resolved—or any deletion, for that matter. If you're going to fix some old fair use rationale, it would be best to do dump a list of images, and not flood my talkpage with DRV notices, as DRV notices carry the conotation of "zOMG the abusive admin did a bad deletion. If it's one, it's fine, but three in a few minutes, startles me, for lack of a better word. Maxim(talk) 18:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've combined the images into one DRV because they more than likely stand or fall together. Stifle (talk) 08:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The images were deleted for lack of a fair use rationale. Can you provide a rationale that meets all the requirements at WP:NFCC? (You might also explain at some stage why you brought the DRV without first attempting to resolve the issue with the deleting admin, like the instructions here explicitly say.) Stifle (talk) 08:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Stifle, if you can provide a valid fair-use rationale for them I see no problem with them being restored or re-uploaded. If you do indeed have a valid rationale I doubt there would have been a problem in just informing the deleting admin of that fact, making this DRV irrelevant. ~ mazcat | c 10:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse deletion. Lack of fair use rationale, at times of deletions, and now. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
