Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Contributor used another of his/her articles as a template; probably no substantial infringement in any case but RevDeled since other article had been edited. — madman 02:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. I don't think it was a copy-paste. What it professed to be - and what i think it was - was pure original research. Removed accordingly. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See talk. This article will likely need heavy revision for content copied from news sources, which the contributor mistakenly believed to be public domain. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 16:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]