No copyright concern. False positive. Never tagged by bot. Current and previous revisions show false positive. NortyNort(Holla) 11:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort(Holla) 11:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. Bluelinked user pages are always a bit alarming here. Contributor did not seem to understand what was wrong; hopefully, I have clarified. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Permission plausible. Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. NortyNort(Holla) 11:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks clean, no preview on book though.--NortyNort(Holla) 09:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. All overwritten by other contributors. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 11:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks clean, search matches look like mirrors containing most of the article.--NortyNort(Holla) 09:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Y Since we can't presume with CCIs and this one has demonstrated either complete ignorance of or lack of interest in copyright, I've stubbed. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 11:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Added on creation, archive shows we copied. An IP tagged the article and didn't notify the creator but the article was created in early 2007. I left a note on the creator's talk. Likely a good faith error for a new user. --NortyNort(Holla) 10:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 11:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined G12 because of foreign language; translated from copyrighted Spanish source into article. No response from creator, suggest deletion.--NortyNort(Holla) 10:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio concern was quoted, attributed but substantial plot description. Plot was present in article from creation and has been replaced by another editor. Not sure if that requires a history purge.--NortyNort(Holla) 10:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Under the circumstances, I think not. It doesn't look like it was ever posted without the quotation marks, which could create more problems if inadvertently restored. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 11:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Restored February 2010 version prior to copyvio insertions. An IP tagged the article and did not notify the contributor in question. I left them the notice but much of the information was promotional and would likely be removed if verified for use. With that, not sure if a revdel is necessary. --NortyNort(Holla) 10:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. I think so. I can be restored if permission is provided. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 11:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Since we can't presume with CCIs and this one has demonstrated either complete ignorance of or lack of interest in copyright, I've stubbed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Added on creation, archive shows we copied. An IP tagged the article and didn't notify the creator but the article was created in early 2007. I left a note on the creator's talk. Likely a good faith error for a new user. --NortyNort (Holla) 10:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)