Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 June 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

22 June 2011[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-06-22 Edit

2011-06-22 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Not 100% sure how this happened, but website is a proxy that seems to have a record of the article creator's sandbox, where he/she developed the article before moving it to mainspace. BelovedFreak 10:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Permission plausible. Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. I'm relisting to facilitate that. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. second article redirected back to original by creator. BelovedFreak 10:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Split from original article, attribution has been provided. BelovedFreak 10:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 08:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Suspect source mirrored Helmut Dörner which has similar text to this article. I added attribution. NortyNort (Holla) 08:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Text added 16 August 2008. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --January (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Text added 16 August 2008. --NortyNort (Holla) 13:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --January (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Contributor who added text believes it may be public domain. I haven't seen proof of this. I replied to their comment on the article's talk page.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It appears the publishers allow non-commercial re-use only [1]. (Commented at talk page.) January (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to a non-infringing target. Entire article copied from source, rev del needed. --NortyNort (Holla) 13:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --January (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]