Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 July 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

5 July 2011[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-07-05 Edit

2011-07-05 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Cleaned by another editor after tagging. This article appears to be an A7 though. NortyNort (Holla) 12:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. NortyNort (Holla) 03:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move, history merge requested or needed. NortyNort (Holla) 12:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. January (talk) 13:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned A history purge may not be need as the text removed included the text of the poem and excessive use of commentary. NortyNort (Holla) 12:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 12:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. --January (talk) 13:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Plot mostly removed by creator, I made a tweak or two. Restoration unlikely. NortyNort (Holla) 12:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Looks like a soon to be deleted PROD though. NortyNort (Holla) 03:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. BelovedFreak 19:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --January (talk) 13:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
I hope I did not make mistakes in the process? This is the first time I contribute to a revdel merge cleanup of a copyvio. -- SchreyP (messages) 21:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. All seems absolutely in order. :) History merge complete. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to a non-infringing target. I redirected to the main article on the temple where there was substantial coverage of the temple's treasure. It appears recent press reports spurred this new 'mysterious' article as well. There was a copyvio problem with one Hindu Times source in the article's initial revision as well. Rev del' needed as well.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --January (talk) 13:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. --NortyNort (Holla) 11:32, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's more in some of the other sources - "One of FilmBuff's main goals ..." [1], and "CRM forged an output deal with Amazon ..." [2]. Wondering whether there's more and if we should delete at this point. January (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY So deleted.--Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I tried to reword some basic lineage facts, it's hard to avoid. Creator blocked for block evasion. --NortyNort (Holla) 11:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to a non-infringing target. ...to the locale. The entire article was copied from their website but I was rather impressed with their use of fonts and colors to make an advert page. Rev del needed. The logo is NF orphaned now as well. --NortyNort (Holla) 11:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. --January (talk) 13:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]