Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 January 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

21 January 2011[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-01-21 Edit

2011-01-21 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. (Taken from 1922 Encyclopædia Britannica which is in public domain in US) BelovedFreak 13:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. BelovedFreak 13:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. BelovedFreak 13:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. BelovedFreak 13:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. BelovedFreak 13:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. And tagged most of the other sections as close paraphrases Acather96 (talk) 08:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. BelovedFreak 13:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Non-compliant mirror Acather96 (talk) 08:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. And cleaned Acather96 (talk) 08:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. BelovedFreak 22:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Re-created, BLP prod'ed --Acather96 (talk) 08:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I do not know if any of the other content was copied (the original tag suggested it was), but I must admit that I've never seen an admin pull a G12 out of deletion over two years after the fact, remove the tag and leave the copied content in publication. Thanks for finding that. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • He said that would be „fair use“ here, we don't have that on German Wikipedia. Instead of this, we would delete the versions with the copied text, you don't seem to have some kind of version deletion, do you? --Geitost 01:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see that this has already been addressed, but I just need to note that we do not handle images here. For image concerns, please follow the directions at the top of the copyright problems board page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copying confirmed; there doesn't seem to have been any text that wasn't contributed by this contributor, and no rewrite was proposed. Deleted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. USGS. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Mirror being used as a circular reference. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. Note that user has been blocked for 72 hours for repeat problems. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]