Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 March 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

26 March 2010[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-03-26 Edit

2010-03-26 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Jafeluv (talk) 12:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done – Toon 18:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one was placed on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/David_lancaster before here, but doesn't it still need proof at commons that the author is the same as the website author? (likely given the editor's username) Are there even supposed to be text articles on Commons? Does anyone who has more experience there want to field this one? VernoWhitney (talk) 17:51, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, so it was speedied, but if anyone has answers I'd still like them. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. --Jafeluv (talk) 02:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Well done. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I did a system search of the e-mail and found no letter clearing permission. Unfortunately, even if this is the copyright holder, we cannot use the text without verifying license. Since the content is substantial and all subsequent versions of the article constitute an unauthorized derivative work without that clearance, I have had to delete it back to the last presumed copyright clear. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done Thank you for noting your concerns. The duplication that I see seems to have originated on Wikipedia first. Please see the article's talk page for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This could use more eyes, as further issues may arise. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Release now posted at website. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --VernoWhitney (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Free license content is now fully attributed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_March_26&oldid=353946374"