Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 July 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

31 July 2010[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-07-31 Edit

2010-07-31 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. BelovedFreak 12:57, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Theleftorium (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. BelovedFreak 21:58, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. BelovedFreak 22:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --VernoWhitney (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. US Goverment rule. --VernoWhitney (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]


  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 15:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 14:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 14:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 15:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY I have blanked and relisted, as I believe this passes the point of close paraphrase into copyright problem. I have not templated the contributor, who is obviously aware of the close paraphrasing issues and keeping an eye on the page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The first substantial edit to the article, five days after creation, corrected a misspelling that is also present at the suspected source. Since the contributor has actively contributed but not addressed or acknowledged these concerns and since I cannot prove that it is not copied, the article has been deleted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]