Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 December 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

24 December 2009[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2009-12-24 Edit

2009-12-24 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Theleftorium 18:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Theleftorium 19:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Theleftorium 14:52, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Theleftorium 14:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Theleftorium 15:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Theleftorium 15:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Theleftorium 15:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bacteriophage experimental evolution contains a section consisting of several selected block-quoted paragraphs attributed to a book that is probably copyrighted (published in 1924.) I cannot decide whether or not the result is fair use. -Arch dude (talk) 20:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY I think probably not, given that it is extensive and that it is not used with any critical conversation, but just sort of dumped there. :) I've removed it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]