Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2008 June 26/Articles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles

Newly created version of article speedily deleted for G12 seems copyvio free. Nevertheless, creator placed an improper assertion of permission on article page. Have advised why the tag used is not necessary or useful. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate entry. Handled under June 25th. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Material clumsily dumped is in public domain. Article already tagged for clean-up. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright concerns already addressed by creator, more or less, with the addition of quotation marks. I've removed those bits for promotional concerns anyway, and tagged the article for PROD. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Material organically developed at article (a contributor claims as much at talk page, and an investigation of the history during October-November of 2007 confirms), so copyright vio the other way. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
False positive. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Already cleaned. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One "apt phrase" that was revised; changed two more words to further distance from source. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another relisting (already addressed). What's up with that DumbBOT? Are you feeling underworked? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cleaned. Spammy! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]