Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 11
July 11
[edit]Category:Cigarette holders
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 02:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Only contents are 3 files; cannot be expanded beyond the main article Cigarette holder (which isn't in the category). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. FWIW I have listed the current contents as a gallery in Cigarette holder. – Fayenatic London 07:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fails WP:NFCC, these images are non-free. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2018 in Tamil Nadu
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 02:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:2018 in Tamil Nadu to Category:2010s in Tamil Nadu and Category:2018 in India
- Nominator's rationale: Isolated category. – Fayenatic London 12:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Admin note: The establishments subcat automatically populates this parent only if it exists. – Fayenatic London 12:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2014 in Odisha
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 02:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:2014 in Odisha to Category:2010s in Odisha
- Propose merging Category:2011 in Odisha to Category:2010s in Odisha
- Propose merging Category:2012 in Odisha to Category:2010s in Odisha
- Propose merging Category:2013 in Odisha to Category:2010s in Odisha
- Nominator's rationale: As above. Redirect following precedent for former siblings. This group of four categories contain only 1 article apart from the establishments subcats. – Fayenatic London 16:55, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Economics category header templates
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 03:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Economics category header templates to Category:Economics templates
- Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary layer, all the contents are in the subcat Category:Economics chronology category header templates. – Fayenatic London 12:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional robbers
[edit]Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 22#Category:Fictional robbers
Category:Mongol states
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 03:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Mongol states to Category:Former countries in Mongolian history
- Nominator's rationale: merge or reverse merge, it is unclear how the categories are different from each other. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The difference is that some of the Mongol states were not physically located in present-day Mongolia. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LaundryPizza03: doesn't that apply to both categories? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, because all of the countries in the Mongolian history category had territory in Mongolia, whereas the Khanate of Kazan was located in European Russia. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LaundryPizza03: doesn't that apply to both categories? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The difference is that some of the Mongol states were not physically located in present-day Mongolia. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 00:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, so that means merge is not an option, but reverse merge still is. It seems too confusing to keep them both. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I will tag Category:Former countries in Mongolian history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 02:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep neither merging nor reverse merging are options. Ilkhanate belongs to the first category but not the second, while First Turkic Khaganate is the reverse. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Works about villains
[edit]Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Category:Works about villains
Category:Family of Boris Johnson
[edit]Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Category:Family of Boris Johnson
16th to 19th century in (Portuguese) Mozambique
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: the motions all carry. No bad proposals were made; all proposals are adopted. This wobbly train somehow did not wreck; kudos to all participants :) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 05:03, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:1501 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1501 establishments in Africa and Category:1501 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1505 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1505 establishments in Africa and Category:1505 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1569 disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1569 disestablishments and Category:16th-century disestablishments in Africa and Category:1569 disestablishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1570 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1570 establishments in Africa and Category:1570 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1576 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1576 establishments in Africa and Category:1576 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1614 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1614 establishments in Africa and Category:1614 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1676 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1676 establishments in Africa and Category:1676 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1676 disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1676 disestablishments in Africa and Category:1676 disestablishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1680 disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1680 disestablishments in Africa and Category:1680 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1776 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1776 establishments in Africa and Category:1776 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1836 establishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1836 establishments in Africa and Category:1836 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1836 disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:1836 disestablishments and Category:1830s disestablishments in Africa and Category:1836 disestablishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Disestablishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1880s in Mozambique to Category:History of Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1887 establishments in Mozambique to Category:1887 establishments in Africa and Category:1880s establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1890s in Portuguese Mozambique to Category:History of Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1890s establishments in Mozambique to Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:1893 establishments in Mozambique to Category:1893 establishments in Africa and Category:1893 establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:Establishments in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:18th-century Mozambican people to Category:18th-century African people and Category:People from Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:18th-century Mozambican women to Category:Mozambican women
- Propose merging Category:19th-century Mozambican people to Category:19th-century African people and Category:People from Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose merging Category:19th-century Mozambican women to Category:Mozambican women
- Propose merging Category:19th-century bishops in Mozambique to Category:People from Portuguese Mozambique
- Nominator's rationale: merge, all single-article categories, not helpful for navigation. Also consistently use "Portuguese Mozambique", as all articles refer to the Portuguese colony, rather than a mix of "Mozambique" and "Portuguese Mozambique", and Category:Portuguese Mozambique needs to exist anyway. I am proposing the latter because we need Category:Portuguese Mozambique anyway. Splitting in four century categories isn't necessary because the history, establishments and disestablishments categories will ultimately contain only 10, 14 and 4 direct articles respectively. This is follow-up on an earlier discussion with User:Fayenatic london. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with most of these, however,
- Propose merging Category:19th-century bishops in Mozambique to Category:People from Portuguese Mozambique, should be Category:19th-century bishops to Category:Bishops in Mozambique because they're still bishops and are bishops in Mozambique
- Mason (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Mason I think you have a good point but please clarify these links, which currently appear mistaken. – Fayenatic London 12:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, let me try to be less lazy this time 🤣 . Some of the relevant parent categories are missing, mainly occupation and century. Specifically,
- Category:19th-century bishops in Mozambique should be merged to Category:People from Portuguese Mozambique, Category:Bishops in Mozambique, and Category:19th-century bishops in Africa.
- Category:19th-century Mozambican women should be merged to Category:Mozambican women, Category:People from Portuguese Mozambique, Category:19th-century African people, and Category:19th-century women.
- Category:18th-century Mozambican women should be merged to Category:Mozambican women, Category:People from Portuguese Mozambique, Category:18th-century African people, and Category:18th-century women.
- In theory the women merge targets could be fine if the category is properly non-diffused, but I'd rather have the redundancy in case someone gets incorrectly removed from a "redundant layer" by the time the bot gets to this. Mason (talk) 22:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, let me try to be less lazy this time 🤣 . Some of the relevant parent categories are missing, mainly occupation and century. Specifically,
- Mason I think you have a good point but please clarify these links, which currently appear mistaken. – Fayenatic London 12:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with most of these, however,
- See also the next nomination regarding the 20th century. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Thank you Marcocapelle for this careful nomination. At the previous discussion I suggested keeping a C18 parent category, but that was of marginal value. – Fayenatic London 12:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- This will empty several layers of parents. IMHO the more important parents should be tagged and listed here so that in future editors will be able to trace the rationale for deleting them. – Fayenatic London 12:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, below are the century categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- This will empty several layers of parents. IMHO the more important parents should be tagged and listed here so that in future editors will be able to trace the rationale for deleting them. – Fayenatic London 12:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:16th century in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose deleting Category:17th century in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose deleting Category:18th century in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose deleting Category:19th century in Portuguese Mozambique
- Propose deleting Category:19th century in Mozambique
- Thanks. I also support Mason's amendments. – Fayenatic London 08:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because some categories have not been tagged for a week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 02:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Still supporting, except Keep Category:19th century in Mozambique. I have added the events from Category:1880s in Mozambique and Category:1890s in Portuguese Mozambique. – Fayenatic London 13:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Smasongarrison and Marcocapelle: are you okay with keeping Category:19th century in Mozambique? HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 03:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with keeping. Mason (talk) 03:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster: alright. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with keeping. Mason (talk) 03:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Smasongarrison and Marcocapelle: are you okay with keeping Category:19th century in Mozambique? HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 03:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.