The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:not renamed. bibliomaniac15 21:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: would "Company SVG logos" (etc) be better? After all, these are not logos of SVG companies. – FayenaticLondon 17:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe. From Commons, I'm used to having "SVG" at the very start, but that might be different here. ~~~~ User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the current names are clearer (and match Commons, which seems to have a good naming pattern in these cases). – FayenaticLondon 23:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom and the previous discussion as WP:OR. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a defining characteristic of the articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge as nominated. – FayenaticLondon 23:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge/delete per WP:SMALLCAT, very fragmented tree for not many articles. Possibly the split by these types of gardens is entirely redundant (e.g. we do not have Category:Funerary gardens), but that is beyond the scope of this nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Look at bolder upmerge later. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom, there are too many categories for mughal gardens, country was category for all kind of mughal gardens will work well. Sajaypal007 (talk) 14:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. – FayenaticLondon 11:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Barring the article and it's discography, every entry in this category is a redirect. Redundant to navigation. Richhoncho (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. And the redirects are frequently deleted at RfD. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, there are five actual articles in it. No objection to removing redirects if they redirect to any of these five articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I created an episode redirect to list category and moved all the appropriate redirects there. As Marcocapelle notes, that still leaves five articles (although Einstein vs. Stephen Hawking should probably be redirected as well and the discography page could be merged with the list of episodes). So weak keep from me as well. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
