Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 September 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 12 September 14 >

September 13[edit]

Category:UEFA Pro Licence holders[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 03:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Recently, this article was deleted, with WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:LISTN being used as arguments. This category is similar to a former category (since deleted) called Category:Association football goalkeepers who have scored, which was turned into an article (List of goalscoring goalkeepers).
The issue with this category is that it is incomplete, and that it would be an insanely huge category should it be correct to what is says it is. It's not an exclusive club or anything, as basically any professional football manager in Europe has this licence; Category:Football managers by nationality already exists, why should we need this? It's an indiscriminate category, I believe, and it is not notable to be a holder of the UEFA Pro Licence, as so many professonal football managers have it.
My conclusion is that this category should be deleted. Thank you. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The licence is common to the occupation and has no notability per se. The occupation is sufficiently categorised already and so this is an unnecessary and pointless category which, as Paul rightly points out, will degenerate into something that breaches WP:IINFO. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Western (genre) staples and terminology[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. bibliomaniac15 03:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Convert Category:Western (genre) staples and terminology to article List of Western genre staples and terminology
Nominator's rationale: For the large majority of items in this category (if not all of them) this is not a defining feature. SpinningSpark 07:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedia Contribution Team members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 03:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Wikipedia:Contribution Team is marked as {{historical}} * Pppery * it has begun... 13:56, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Senior Wikipedians supporters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 03:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Inappropriate advocacy user category. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:ProgRock Records albums[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 03:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The article about ProgRock Records was deleted through AFD. Does not seem like a relevant categorization. Geschichte (talk) 10:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters by occupation and gender[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Withdraw by nom, accidental nomination. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete as being an unnecessary cross-categorization. We already have Category:Fictional characters by gendered occupation for this. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Male superheroes[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 1#Category:Male superheroes

Category:Powered exoskeletons in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 03:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:NONDEF. None of the works in question are defined by their inclusion of powered armor. Even games like Halo are "about" the Halo ringworlds and Covenant invasion, not Master Chief's armor. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom and upmerge articles where necessary. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - this is not a defining element even in media where they are featured prominently.--AlexandraIDV 11:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Law in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per categories like Category:Legal films. More clearly defining criteria for inclusion. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2021 in Scottish women's football[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:2021–22 in Scottish women's football. bibliomaniac15 03:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Women's football in Scotland moved to a winter season format in autumn 2020, following the cancellation of the 2020 summer season. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Also for compatibility with title of main article. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:High school football competitions in the United States[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 1#Category:High school football competitions in the United States

Category:Protected areas of the Southern California area[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename but to Category:Protected areas of Southern California, WP:C2C with siblings in Category:Southern California. The discrepancy between the MOS and the usage within the article needs addressing, and has been raised on the article talk page. – Fayenatic London 15:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Having "area" twice in the name of a category sounds strange, especially since "southern California" is usually used as a stand-alone term, without "area" appended to it. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 00:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom. Probably a mistake that could be speedy corrected. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question. We actually have a discrepancy between MOS:COMPASS, which says that Southern California is an example that's consistently capitalized, and the article, where local consensus currently does not capitalize "southern." Personally, I agree with the MOS, but that might be a discussion for another venue. Definitely support the elimination of the latter "area" for this cat though. bibliomaniac15 01:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films set in Toulouse[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Films set in France. bibliomaniac15 03:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_13&oldid=1073193265"