Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 21 May 23 >

May 22

[edit]

Category:Mythological cosmologies

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not distinct enough, as evidenced by their contents and especially their subcategories. Main article is titled Religious cosmology. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Burials at Hollywood Forever Cemetery

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus on the keep/delete alternative. There was no discussion of the proposal to rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I’m using the above category as an example for my proposal that all “Burials at” categories be renamed to “Interments at”. My reasoning being that not every interment in a cemetery is a burial. Many could be cremated and stored into a wall niche or an above ground crypt, thus not falling into being “buried”. Of course I could just be over semantic about it, I just feel it’s more accurate to call it “Interments at”. Rusted AutoParts 17:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a deletion discussion, it's one in regards to renaming. Rusted AutoParts 23:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm suggesting a different CFD outcome than the one originally proposed (but I'm neutral on the naming if kept). - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But this was to broach whether the categories should be renamed. Whether they should be deleted should be it’s own discussion as opposed to being thrust onto this one. Rusted AutoParts 05:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:All Linux Distributions

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 08:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicates Category:Linux distributions. Guy Macon (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Independent Linux distributions

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicates Category:Linux distributions. Every Linux distribution is independent. Guy Macon (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: created at the same time and by the same person as Category:All Linux Distributions listed above. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:44, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Articles using template 'Track gauge' with unrecognized input

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 30#Category:Articles using template 'Track gauge' with unrecognized input

Category:Children of Charles, Prince of Wales

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker (talk) 13:43, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very small category, unlikely to expand at this stage. PatGallacher (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Belgian people (before 1830)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:13, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Belgium didnt exist before 1830. Is this a sensible categorisation? Rathfelder (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly because Belgium didn't exist before 1830, this is a sensible distinction within the category:Belgian people. In the Dutch Wikipedia it's called nl:Categorie:Zuid-Nederlands persoon (voor 1830) (people of the Southern Netherlands). In French it is fr:catégorie:Personnalité belge (avant 1830). Before 1830 the territory of the (Southern) Netherlands sometimes was called 'pays belgiques' (Belgian lands, in French) or 'Belgica/Belgium' (in Latin). There was no unique name for this people (Flemish, Dutch, Austrian Netherlandish, Belgian). - Karel Anthonissen (talk) 11:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Disney Renaissance franchise

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unneeded category. All entries and all category tags are already present in Category:Disney Renaissance (or at each specific franchise category), and I don't see any need to split that category up. Gonnym (talk) 10:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 09:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Operation Homefront

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT
Operation Homefront is an American veteran organization. An organizational category is fine and so is a subcategory for the national heads of that organization but the only 2 articles here are Operation Homefront and CEO John I. Pray with little growth potential. Those articles are both crosslinked and well categorized so no merge is needed. No objection to recreating (or creating a CEO subcat) if either ever get up to 5+ articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:International Game Developers Association members

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCASSOC and WP:TRIVIALCAT
International Game Developers Association is a membership based organization you can join right here with a credit card: $60/yr for standard individual membership or $30/yr for students. This category contains companies not people though and, while the IGDA website does list corporate "affiliates", that official list doesn't match this category so I'm not sure if we're categorizing by former members or there is some other IGDA relationship involved. Whatever this association is or was, it doesn't seem defining in the articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_22&oldid=1073193179"