Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 April 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 3

[edit]

Category:Ripple payment network

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Most article links have little relation to the cryptocurrency. Delete per WP:SMALLCAT Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Uncanny valley

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category seems too narrow. The only pages to have this as a category are films that critics have opted to having the uncanny valley, such as The Polar Express or Cats (2019 film); none of the articles are directly connected to the entire concept of the uncanny valley. So this category feels more like WP:Fancruft Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 17:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television programming blocks established in 1905

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy-delete as nonsense/vandalism. DMacks (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Television never existed in 1905. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1905 in television

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy-delete as nonsense/vandalism. DMacks (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Television never existed in 1905. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1900s in television

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy-delete as nonsense/vandalism. DMacks (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Television never existed in the 1900s. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films with screenplays by J. Mahendran

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films with screenplays by Mahendran (filmmaker) in light of how this discussion was closed. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:34, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match the parent article: Mahendran (filmmaker) Kailash29792 (talk) 03:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of Civil Merit (Syria)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEFINING (WP:PERFCAT, WP:OVERLAPCAT, and WP:OCAWARD)
The Order of Civil Merit (Syria) is a general purpose award and the recipients tend to fall into three categories:
Regardless of the reason, the articles generally list the award in passing with other honours, if at all. There wasn't a list so I created one right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well sure they weren't given at random, like Valentina Tereshkova was the first woman in space and a Soviet icon. - RevelationDirect (talk)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of Dannebrogordenens Hæderstegn

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING (WP:OCAWARD and WP:OVERLAPCAT)
The Order of the Dannebrog is a Danish award and we can discuss Category:Order of the Dannebrog in a future nomination. At issue here is the Dannebrogordenens Hæderstegn ("Cross of Honour of the Order of the Dannebrog") which is now a supplemental award for people who have already won the Order of the Dannebrog and are already categorized by it. It used to be a separate award though but we only have two articles from that earlier version (Henning Jakob Henrik Lund and Daniel Larsen Schevig) and neither seems defined by the award. There wasn't a list so I created one right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.